Risky Business #554 -- Is there an iOS exploit glut?

Apple's mobile OS has a very bad week...

Alex Stamos is our news co-host this week. Patrick and Alex discuss all the week’s security news, including:

  • Mass exploitation of iOS devices by Chinese govt
  • Telegram moves to nix phone number enumeration “feature”
  • USA targeted Iranian maritime awareness system
  • Existence of Stuxnet mole revealed by Kim Zetter
  • @jack gets hacked
  • Much, much more

This week’s sponsor interview is with Michelle Price of AustCyber. AustCyber is the organisation here in Australia that aims to build out the Australian cyber security industry and skills base, and Michelle pops in this week to tell us all about the upcoming Australian Cyber Week.

Links to everything are below in the show notes.

Risky Business #553 -- Imperva's cloud WAF gets owned hard

PLUS: Fortinet and Pulse Security SSL VPNs, Webmin interfaces attacked in wild...

On this week’s show Adam Boileau and Patrick Gray discuss the week’s security news, including:

  • Fortinet, Pulse Security VPNs are being exploited in wild
  • Imperva’s cloud WAF gets colossally owned
  • US authorities fear ransomware attacks against election systems
  • Apple fixes re-introduced jailbreak bug
  • Telegram design choice puts HK protestors at risk
  • Researcher drops two 0days in Valve’s Steam client after bounty spat
  • Much, much more

This week’s sponsor guest is Ryan Kalember, EVP of cybersecurity strategy with Proofpoint. Ryan is stopping by this week to touch on a couple of topics. He’ll tell us why Proofpoint didn’t attribute a recent malware campaign targeting US utilities to APT10 despite there being some pretty APT10-like tradecraft used in that particular campaign.

He’ll also talk a bit about how thread hijacking is a giant pain in the ass. That’s where attackers take over a mailbox, then just jump right in replying to existing mail threads. Detecting that is hard, of course, because it’s internal mail. It’s a great little mixed bag interview.

Enjoy!

Risky Biz Soap Box: Casey Ellis on "match.com for hackers"

Bounty programs, yes, but skills matching the future for Bugcrowd and its ilk...

We used to think of companies like Bugcrowd as offering a very simple service: managed bug bounties. But these days that’s a bit too simplistic. All the “bounty” companies are offering more comprehensive and specific products these days. In this edition of the Soap Box podcast Bugcrowd CTO Casey Ellis joins the show to talk through what the future looks like in crowdsourced security. Matching individual hackers’ skills to individual gigs and launching new services like Bugcrowd for Marketplaces will be a big part of that future.

Risky Business #552 -- Guest host Alex Stamos on all the week's security news

Chinese disinformation, Bluetooth flaws, Apple sues Corellium and more...

In this week’s show Patrick Gray and Alex Stamos discuss all the week’s news, including:

  • Confirmed: 30 companies affected by CapitalOne attacker
  • China info-ops booted off Twitter, Facebook
  • Real deal Bluetooth bugs
  • Apple re-introduces kernel bug, jailbreaks aplenty
  • Apple to sue Corellium for copyright infringement
  • DPRK gets its malware VT’d by CYBERCOM
  • Much, much more

Haroon Meer of Thinkst Canary is this week’s sponsor guest. We spoke to Haroon while he was in the USA, just before he was about to deliver a talk to USENIX all about “embracing hackiness”. Haroon thinks “hackiness” is a huge advantage for red teams, but that doesn’t mean blue teams can’t use the same hacky approaches to defence. It’s a typically great chat with Haroon. Links to everything discussed are below.

Feature Podcast: Inaction is escalatory

A fascinating conversation with former senior Pentagon cyber official Kate Charlet...

This podcast is brought to you by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, and it’s the second in a series of podcasts we’re doing that are all about cyber policy.

The Foundation funds a lot of interesting people and work in the cybersecurity space. So the idea behind this podcast series is pretty simple: we talk to Hewlett’s grant recipients, or experts in Hewlett’s network, about pressing policy issues and turn those conversations into podcasts. The whole idea is to get some policy perspectives out there among the Risky Business audience, which, funnily enough, includes a lot of policymakers.

In this podcast we’re speaking with Katherine Charlet. She currently serves as the director of the Technology and International Affairs Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Prior to joining Carnegie, Kate served as the deputy assistant secretary of defence for cyber policy, where she managed the development of US Department of Defence cyber policy and strategy, its development of cyber capabilities, and the expansion of its international relationships.

This conversation essentially covers what the state of affairs is when it comes to militaries and their actions in the cyber domain. It was only a few weeks ago that reports claimed the United States government launched a cyber attack against Iranian weapons systems. We’ll hear from Kate about what she thinks that all means, and then we’re going to talk about all sorts of stuff really – the blurring of the line between what warrants a law enforcement response versus a military response, what the path to this situation looked like, so on and so on. But I kicked things off by asking Kate to tell us what this concept of “defending forward” actually means. In the last couple of years we’ve heard that term bandied about by all sorts of people, but everyone seems to have a different definition. Here, Kate shares her more definitive definition.

Risky Business #551 -- Post Vegas edition, more news than we can handle

An amazing bunch of stories to get through...

Adam Boileau is along this week to discuss the week’s security news. We cover:

  • Follow ups on CapitalOne
  • Amazon EBS snapshots exposed
  • North Korea bags $2bn in cybercrime spree
  • Attempted Coinbase breach postmortem
  • Apple’s new research phones for bug hunters
  • APT41 busted moonlighting
  • Cloudflare finally ditches 8chan
  • Leaked Boeing 787 code shredded, full of bugs
  • Qualcomm bugs pave path through to Android kernel
  • Microsoft gets Tavis’d
  • More RDP/RDS bugs
  • Much, much more

This week’s sponsor interview is with Jake King of CMD. CMD has developed a control layer for Linux systems that restricts account actions, not just by traditional permissions. Jake will be along this week to talk a little bit about EDR on Linux. He saw a nice talk from some IBM X-Forcers at Black Hat about Linux EDR bypasses and that led to a conversation about Linux EDR generally. It’s interesting stuff

Links to everything that we discussed are below and you can follow Patrick or Adam on Twitter if that’s your thing.

Risky Business #550 -- CapitalOne owned, Hutchins sentenced, VxWorks horror-show and more!

A big pre-Vegas news week....

Adam Boileau is along this week to discuss the week’s security news. We cover:

  • Deep dive on the CapitalOne breach
  • Marcus Hutchins sentenced to time served
  • Telegram voicemail bug leads to political crisis in Brazil
  • Ransomware leaves South Africans without electricity
  • Much, much more

Wolfgang Goerlich is this week’s sponsor guest. He’s an advisory CISO with Duo Security and will be along after this week’s news segment to walk us through Duo’s Trusted Access Report. They’ve got some interesting telemetry to share with us.

Links to everything that we discussed are below and you can follow Patrick or Adam on Twitter if that’s your thing.

Risky Business #549 -- FSB contractor breached, Equifax fined, NSO Group targets cloud

Another huge week of infosec news...

Adam Boileau is along this week to discuss the week’s security news. We cover:

  • FSB contractor gets itself a whole lotta owned
  • NSO Group pitches cloud access
  • Hal Martin gets 9 years
  • NSA to launch defensive division
  • Bulgarian breach data exposed
  • DataSpii scandal a 2019 privacy case study
  • Google boots DarkMatter certificates from Chrome and Android
  • Equifax fined $700m
  • Horror show bugs in enterprise VPN concentrators from Palo Alto, Fortinet
  • Microsoft demos ElectionGuard SDK (looks pretty cool)

This week’s sponsor interview is with Casey Ellis of Bugcrowd. We’ll talk about how organisations are increasingly doing bug bounties on technology they use, not just technology they develop. And then we’ll be talking about a new thing Bugcrowd is doing – Bugcrowd for marketplaces.

Links to everything that we discussed are below and you can follow Patrick or Adam on Twitter if that’s your thing.

Risky Biz Soap Box: Ryan Kalember of Proofpoint on "Very Attacked People"

A deep dive on risk scoring your users...

Soap Box isn’t the regular, weekly show we do at Risky.Biz, if you’re looking for that, just scroll one podcast back in your feed or on the Risky Business website.

Soap Box is a fully sponsored podcast series we do where vendors pay to come on and talk about research they’ve done, products they’ve launched, whatever.

This edition of Soap Box is a particularly good one. Ryan Kalember is EVP of cybersecurity strategy at Proofpoint and he’s our guest in this edition. Ryan was on the show a little while back talking about the concept of VAPs – very attacked people. In this interview he’s going to expand on that.

It’s one thing to know that some of your key people are being attacked, but let’s take it one step further. Of those people, who among them is most likely to actually do something like click an untrusted link? What do we know about those users that can tell us how at-risk they are, based on how frequently they’re attacked, and also how likely they are to engage with phishing attempts or dodgy attachments? And if they ARE a risky user, what can you do about that? Measuring risk is only useful if you can do something about it.

Risky Business #548 -- Zoom RCE details and all the week's news

Adam Boileau and Shubham Shah talk news, bugs...

Adam Boileau is along this week to discuss the week’s security news. We cover:

  • US mayors agree: no more paying off ransomware crews
  • BitPoint exchange loses $32m in cryptocurrency
  • FinSpy is back, big time
  • Chinese AV companies won’t flag government malware
  • US security companies free to help political campaigns with discounted services, products
  • Facebook to pay $5bn privacy fine with money from its spare pants
  • Much, much more

Assetnote’s Shubham Shah also joins the news segment to dish on the Zoom RCE bug he and his team found back in March.

This week’s sponsor is Kasada, an Australian company that runs a bot filtering service. Kasada is a relatively new company but they’re kicking some pretty serious goals here in Australia and are now pushing into other markets like the USA. But instead of supplying us with one of their people, they suggested we interview one of their customers - REA Group CSO and head of platform Craig Templeton.

REA Group runs realestate.com.au, Australia’s biggest real estate listings website. They had all sorts of trouble with content scrapers, bots causing service interruptions, cred stuffing, you name it. In the end they went with Kasada to solve their bot problems and Craig pops by this week to talk about the issues they were having and to sing Kasada’s praises. Getting a reference customer to speak publicly is a Herculean task, so full credit to Kasada for making this one happen. If you operate a website that pushes a lot of traffic you’ll want to hear that interview.

Risky Business #547 -- Zoom-gate, massive GDPR fines, ship hack warnings and more

Zoom is an even bigger trash fire than people realise...

Adam Boileau is along this week to discuss the week’s security news. We cover:

  • Zoom’s week from hell
  • BA, Marriott face massive GDPR fines
  • Seth Rich conspiracy originated from Russia’s SVR
  • Coast Guard warns of ship hax
  • Cybercommand issues warning on DDE exploitation
  • PGP ecosystem having a rough time
  • Much, much more!

This week’s show is brought to you by our lovely friends at Signal Sciences. I guess you’d call them a next generation WAF. Signal Sciences co-founder and CTO Zane Lackey will be along in this week’s sponsor interview to plug their new cloud-based WAF product, and also to have a chat about a trend he’s seeing at non-security conferences – more high quality security content.

Links to everything that we discussed are below and you can follow Patrick or Adam on Twitter if that’s your thing.

Risky Biz Soap Box: Cylance talks Persona

Endpoint software that knows you are actually you...

As regular listeners know, this isn’t the weekly Risky Biz news and current affairs show, if you want that, scroll back in the podcast feed to the previous podcast. This is a Soap Box edition, a solely sponsored podcast series we do here at Risky Biz where vendors pay us to come on to the show to talk about, well, whatever they want, really.

We’ve heard Duo Security talking about WebAuthn, we’ve got one with Proofpoint coming up that’s about insights they’ve gleaned from filtering such ridiculous amounts of email.

But in this edition, Garret Grajek from BlackBerry Cylance will be along to talk about its new product, Cylance Persona. This latest product is kinda out of the box, it’s a machine learning classifier that you install on the endpoint that learns what the typical user behaviour looks like. Once the observed user behaviour starts diverging from what’s expected, it can perform actions – like kicking up for 2fa, locking the user out, whatever you want, really.

It’s a novel approach to dealing with compromised endpoints. Two factor authentication is great, but if your endpoints are hosed that doesn’t really count for much. And that’s really what this new gear is about.

Risky Business #546 -- The fifth domain sees some action

Reports from the cyber front!

Adam Boileau is along this week to discuss the week’s security news. We cover:

  • NYTimes reports USA is getting all up in Russia’s grids
  • Kremlin not happy
  • CYBERCOM targets Iranian rocket control and APT crews
  • TRITON attackers target US grid
  • Turla completes hostile takeover of Oilrig
  • Reuters publishes huge feature on Cloudhopper/APT10
  • China pwns global telcos, targets key subscribers
  • FVEY owns Yandex
  • Tourists entering Xinjiang now have mobile malware installed at border
  • Florida city governments having a bad time
  • Much, much more!

This week’s edition of Risky Business is brought to you by Senetas. They make layer 2 encryption tech, but they’ve also got a content disarm and reconstruction play now, Votiro, as well as their safe file sharing platform SureDrop. But we’re sticking with encryption in this week’s sponsor interview. Senetas CTO Julian Fay will be along a bit later to talk about his trip to the International Crypto Module Conference. He’ll fill us in on what the agenda was there – lots of talk about quantum resistant crypto and also some talk about streamlining various certification regimes.

Links to everything that we discussed are below and you can follow Patrick or Adam on Twitter if that’s your thing.

Feature podcast: An interview with Jim Baker, former general counsel, FBI

The encryption wars are locked in a stalemate...

This is the first edition of a new series of podcasts we’re doing here at Risky.Biz that will focus on cyber policy issues. The Hewlett Foundation approached us a while back to see if we’d be interested in doing this series we jumped at the opportunity.

The Foundation funds a lot of interesting people and work in the cybersecurity space. So the idea is pretty simple: we can talk to some of Hewlett’s grant recipients or experts in its network about pressing policy issues and turn those conversations into podcasts. The whole idea is to get some policy perspectives out there among the Risky Business audience, which, funnily enough, includes a lot of policy people.

Our first cab off the rank is this interview with Jim Baker. He joined the Department of Justice in 1990 and rose through the ranks to become the FBI general counsel in January 2014, a position he held until December 2017. So of course he was running all things legal for the FBI during the Apple-FBI dispute over a locked iPhone 5C recovered from the gunman responsible for the San Bernardino shooting.

Baker was the US Government’s point man on all things encryption, taking stances that outraged technologists and reinvigorated a policy debate that had – at least to a degree – stagnated for years. These days, Jim Baker serves as Director of the R Street think tank’s National Security and Cybersecurity Program.

This interview focusses on the so-called encryption wars. The FBI and other law enforcement/intelligence agencies want better access to encrypted material, while technologists say that’s impossible to accomplish without introducing unacceptable risks into the technology ecosystem. Baker shares his view on the topic.

The Australian government law enforcement and intelligence agencies guide to the Assistance and Access Act, which is mentioned in the introduction to the podcast, can be found here. (Ironically enough, served over http!)

PLEASE NOTE: Jim Baker joined our meeting via a phone call, so the audio quality here isn’t up to our usual standards. Sorry about that!

Risky Business #545 -- US Government loses control of customs mugshot database

PLUS: Android devices shipped certified pre-pwned...

On this week’s show Adam Boileau and Patrick Gray discuss the week’s news, including:

  • CBP loses photo and license plate database
  • Some Android phones shipped with backdoor
  • Info on Google’s cloud outage
  • USG ramps up “defend forward”
  • Trump and Mnuchin can’t get their stories straight on Huawei
  • The latest from Baltimore, more on that RDP bug
  • TalkTalk hacker sentenced
  • Much, much more

This week’s show is brought to you by Remediant! Remediant CEO Tim Keeler will be along this week to have a chinwag. We’ll talk about how simple security tech is really en vogue these days and how that’s a good thing.

Links to everything are below, and you can follow Patrick or Adam on Twitter if that’s your thing.

Risky Business #544 -- NYTimes Baltimore report falls over

PLUS all the week's news...

On this week’s show Patrick and Adam talk through all the week’s security news, including:

  • NYTimes story on EternalBlue and Baltimore is bunk
  • An RDP worm is feeling kind of inevitable
  • Iran is still getting Shadowbrokersed
  • Intercept has a great feature on SID Today dumps
  • Australian Federal Police crack down on national security journalism
  • Phantom Secure CEO gets nine years and loses $80m
  • Silk Road 2.0 admin must be an amazing snitch
  • Another Bitcoin tumbler bites the dust
  • Much, much more

This week’s sponsor interview is with Marco Slaviero of Thinkst Canary.

Marco is joining us this week to talk about how he thinks web application-based deception techniques are kind of a waste of time right now. We talk about how deception approaches work best in privileged domains, then we talk about how security teams do better when they have a dedicated ops developer.

Risky Business #543 -- NYTimes blames NSA for Baltimore hacks, Assange faces espionage charges

With special guest co-host Alex Stamos...

Adam Boileau couldn’t make it this week, but that’s ok because we’ve got former Facebook CSO and current Stanford adjunct professor Alex Stamos filling in for him in today’s show. He’ll be talking through all the week’s security news, including:

  • NYTimes report blames Baltimore ransomware attack on leaked NSA exploit
  • Assange to face espionage charges, extradition fight looming
  • SanboxEscaper just keeps dropping those 0days
  • Fury over Facebook’s response to doctored Pelosi video
  • Much, much more

This week’s sponsor interview with David Warburton of F5 Networks. You know F5 as a blinky-light box manufacturer. Load balancers, SSL termination, that sort of stuff. Not exactly a growth industry at the moment, so they’re pivoting.

They’ve dropped $670m on NGINX – f5 now owns the NGINX company – and they’re making all sorts of moves in the appsec space. That interview is mostly about F5’s business, but I found it interesting because what do you do when you’re an $8bn company that makes data-centre equipment and that industry starts going into decline?

Links to everything discussed are below, and you can follow Patrick or Alex on Twitter if that’s your thing.

Risky Biz Soap Box: VMRay CEO Carsten Willems talks sandbox tech

Automated reversing isn't perfect, but we live in an imperfect world...

This is not the regular Risky Business weekly show, the Soap Box series of podcasts that run on Risky.Biz are wholly sponsored. Everyone you hear in Soap Box paid to be here.

With that disclaimer out of the way, this is actually a really interesting conversation. Carsten Willems is the co-founder and CEO of VMRay, a company that makes… well.. what do you call it? Is it an incident response tool? Is it a detection tool? Or is it just a good hypervisor-based sandbox that you can use to do both of those things?

I’m going to say it’s the third – VMRay is a company that makes a great hyper-visor sandbox and has applied that technology to both response and detection.

In an ideal world you’d have a team of malware reversers on staff pulling apart every single binary that looks shady. But this isn’t a perfect world, so that’s never going to happen. So the original use case that Carsten and his team set out to solve was around automating malware reversing. They build a hyper-visor based sandbox that’s very hard to bypass, you can run your standard build on it, throw binaries and documents at it and see what blows up. That’s really the primary use case here.

But there is a second use case, which is detection. VMRay can give you a pretty decent risk score on samples, and they’ve entered into a few OEM arrangements with vendors to provide that extra level of detection.

I’d never met Carsten Willems before we prepared this podcast, but it’s safe to say we hit it off. This podcast basically turned into Carsten telling his story, the story of where VMRay came from and where he wants it to go. Enjoy!

Risky Business #542 -- Confusion reigns over Huawei ban

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

On this week’s show Patrick and Adam talk through all the week’s security news, including:

  • New executive order paved way for Huawei ban
  • Google pulls service from Huawei
  • No wait, that’s not right, it’s for new handsets
  • The ban’s now reversed to allow them to continue the support that they didn’t have to discontinue?
  • I’m so confused
  • ¯_(ツ)_/¯
  • Israeli broadcaster fingers Hamas over Eurovision coverage hack
  • New moves to regulate offensive cyber services
  • Salesforce has a bad time
  • Instagram influencers have a bad time (Hah!)
  • OGUsers pwned
  • Much, much more

This week’s show is brought to you by CMD Security. They make security software for Linux that does two things – firstly it gives you visibility into what’s happening on your Linux workloads, which actions are being performed by which accounts, that sort of thing. The second thing it does is allow you to lock down accounts by action, rather than by traditional privilege. They’re funded by Google Ventures, among others, and although they’re a relatively small and new company I think they’re going to do really well.

Jake was just at a MITRE conference in Brussels that was all about the Attack Matrix. He’s joining me this week to have a bit of talk about his experience at that event, then we’ll be talking through some of the issues he’s seeing out there in Linux cloud workload land. Jake’s a great communicator and a very smart guy and that interview is a lot of fun.

Links to everything are below, and you can follow Patrick or Adam on Twitter if that’s your thing.

There's a problem with WhatsApp, but it isn't end-to-end encryption

Jake Davis weighs in on WhatsApp...

In recent days at least one news outlet has sought to sow the seeds of distrust around end-to-end encryption.

Unfortunately this means a number of people are now under the impression that secure messaging apps are pointless because one’s phone could be hacked via other means, rendering all encryption obsolete. This is a bad, retrograde take, but that’s not to say that WhatsApp is without its issues.

You can argue about degrees, but WhatsApp is unquestionably a product of the surveillance capitalist ecosystem. Eventually it will evolve to monetise the digital exhaust of our interactions, or in terms Harvard professor Shoshana Zuboff puts it: using private human experience as raw materials in a behavioural data rendering process which is designed to herd and tune us towards profitable outcomes.

The suppliers of widely-adopted secure communications should not also be the controllers of this behavioural modification market. Any application claiming to offer privacy must be entirely disentangled from the interests of these parties. Apple has had a crack with iMessage, but sadly its products remain out of reach to most of the world. iPhones are bloody expensive, and not everyone can afford to pay a ridiculous premium on a shiny phone so their personal communications don’t wind up as a part of a data set flagged for monetisation.

Here’s the trap: digital consumer platforms like WhatsApp offer an incredibly attractive bargain to consumers. Unlike the platform-locked iMessage, they’re cross-platform, free, easy, and offer relatively robust security protections. And they’ve become central to the modern, digital experience.

Google’s mail infrastructure is another great example. At the moment it’s the best we can hope for when it comes to nudging the average user towards some form of agreeable security mixed with ease. There are many alternative email platforms which are more ethical, transparent, and in my personal opinion offer a more friendly experience, and I will routinely try and herd people towards them, but most folks simply don’t want to complicate their lives.

Some in the information security world blame this on human laziness, but that’s off the mark. There’s a fundamental difference between being lazy and wanting less hassle. The implementation of fiddly alternatives and self-made servers is a wholly unappealing thought for anyone not heavily invested in the field of information security, and letting the end user run free with their own code and implementation makes them far more vulnerable to hacking and things being set on fire.

Having personalised ads constantly shoved in your face is the 21st century bargain we’ve accepted as the trade-off for access to these services.

But let’s imagine a lovely, meditative scenario where we dismantle Google Mail and move everybody to another platform. To make this tempting for millions of people we’d have to uproot the workplace document storage environment, around two dozen regularly used interconnected applications that cover time-keeping, finance, and data, an entire branch of mobile phone operating systems, and who knows how many “stored preferences” that interconnect all of the things the average person enjoys on a daily basis. It’s a technology soup that’s borderline impossible to unmix.

With all of that in mind, it’s extremely unfair to call anyone out for being unwilling to step back from these monopolies, because key elements of their life are tied directly to them. It’s an alarming reality, and one that needs to be broken down in small chunks and whacked at with a machete until the path is finally clear to proceed.

WhatsApp’s main appeal to the masses is not its secure, end-to-end encryption, but its general simplicity. For those that aren’t largely tech-savvy, it’s arguably the most accessible mobile communication interface, both at an application and psychological level.

The fact that tens of millions of people are now, without even needing to understand it, using necessary high level encryption protocols in their real-time messaging is just a happy accident. 99% of WhatsApp’s users more than likely have no idea how E2E encryption works and they don’t even particularly care about it.

That’s fine. It exists, in the background, as a very fortunate byproduct of the attraction of the other, shiny, appealing traits of the platform, which as we all know tend to focus on things like talking to people quickly, setting up connections with family members, accessing and disseminating media from various sources in seconds. The things humans like doing on a regular basis while exerting as little energy as possible.

But is that good enough? For a while, but not in the long term. WhatsApp is not the endgame. It’s certainly moved the dial in terms of readily-available security for everyday conversation, but people deserve better. More accurately, we need less of specific things. Less “would you like to back up your messages weekly to the cloud,” less “connect with Facebook,” less “opt-in to exactly what we say or we won’t give you X”.

Establishing a sustainable model for secure communications providers is a daunting prospect for those who must eventually become “the new WhatsApp”. I believe the very competent teams behind similar apps such as Signal, Wire, and Threema are going to be at the heart of the eventual shift into the new era of communication, but it’s impossible to say at this moment in time how that shift will pan out.

In the meantime, though, let’s keep our eye on the ball. There are reasons to be wary of WhatsApp, but attacking end-to-end encryption as a “gimmick” is a rotten red herring that belongs in the bin.

Jake Davis is a former global hacker terrorist menace who now works in a creative young person job that I don’t quite understand I dunno ask him his twitter account is here.